Add implicit resharper settings

[stefannikolei]

Prerequisites

• I have written a descriptive pull-request title
• I have verified that there are no overlapping pull-requests open
• I have verified that I am following matches the existing coding patterns and practice as demonstrated in the repository. These follow strict Stylecop rules 👮.
• I have provided test coverage for my change (where applicable)

Description

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds ReSharper-specific settings to enforce implicit object creation style alongside existing Roslyn rules.

• Introduces a ReSharper inspection severities comment block.
• Adds two Resharper settings to error on object creation when type is (not) evident.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

.editorconfig:164

• Consider adding a reference or URL to the official ReSharper EditorConfig documentation here so that future contributors can verify valid setting names and expected values.

# ReSharper inspection severities

.editorconfig:165

• Double-check that the inspection key resharper_arrange_object_creation_when_type_evident_highlighting matches the official ReSharper naming convention for implicit object creation inspections. If the plugin uses a different identifier (for example including “implicit” or a different suffix), update it to the correct property name.

resharper_arrange_object_creation_when_type_evident_highlighting = error

.editorconfig:166

• Similarly, verify that the key resharper_arrange_object_creation_when_type_not_evident_highlighting is correctly named according to ReSharper’s EditorConfig support. Adjust it if the official inspection ID differs.

resharper_arrange_object_creation_when_type_not_evident_highlighting = error

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 19%. Comparing base (6fe431a) to head (c92d6fa).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@        Coverage Diff         @@
##           main   #52   +/-   ##
==================================
  Coverage    19%   19%           
==================================
  Files         4     4           
  Lines       346   346           
  Branches     85    85           
==================================
  Hits         68    68           
  Misses      278   278           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	19% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.