Add draft of the specification of validation#101
Conversation
|
Woohoo, excited to see this; great work! Just to lay out my plan, I'll be incrementally reviewing the PR in detail over the coming weeks, submitting comments piecemeal. |
0210ee8 to
3109b97
Compare
3109b97 to
9a40737
Compare
|
@lukewagner Updated with the current structure of resource types. I also removed the checkin of docs/, since it doesn't seem to have worked to provide an easy rendered version & it causes a lot of noise in git. See the rendered version for now; if this is merged, I'll set up CI hooks + GH Pages to get a CI rendered version. |
9a40737 to
8086956
Compare
8086956 to
2601394
Compare
|
@lukewagner As discussed, this version has been de-Sphinx'd. It's mostly in line with the reference implementation now. The changes from the previous version are mostly minor (but important) fixes; the largest presentational change is also the exception to that (i.e. is not yet done in the reference implementation), but should not actually change almost anything: existential quantifiers have been moved from |
|
Sorry for the slow reply here, but excited to see this update! Could you perhaps also include a rendered .pdf in the |
824fdc5 to
74bd278
Compare
This PR adds a spec/document folder with a draft of the beginnings of a spec document, currently providing a formalisation of validation rules for the component model.