Conversation
|
Hi @alexdunae, happy to see this PR. However, I don't think this would close off #1152, as it doesn't capture if the key of the restored cache is different from the primary key. |
Correct, it was just related but not closing that issue entirely. I’m happy to add that extra output if it’s of interest? |
|
@ramblingenzyme I've added |
|
@alexdunae only just seeing this now, I hadn't made the distinction between "relates" and "closes off" when I read the PR description originally. Thanks for adding the second key though, much appreciated. 🙇🏽 |
|
@ramblingenzyme no problem. Anything you need to get this merged? |
|
Is it possible to get the second review so this can merge? |
|
Circling back on this @ramblingenzyme is there any way to ping another codeowner to get a second review? |
|
@alexdunae sorry, I'm not actually a codeowner, not sure how to get their attention either. 😢 |
|
Hello @alexdunae, Thank you for this Pull request. We will review and get back to you once we have some feedback on this :) |
|
Hello @aparnajyothi-y, is there any update on this PR? |
Description:
Adds
cache-keyas an outputRelated issue:
Check list: